Throughout history, every generation has witnessed its share of charlatans and deceptive figures. From traveling snake oil salesmen to elaborate pyramid schemes and the self-proclaimed prophets of the New Age movement, these individuals are more than just morally questionable figures exploiting the vulnerable. They represent the embodiment of each era's aspirations and anxieties.

The past decade is no exception, with figures promoting concepts like critical race theory and certain medical interventions. Driven by a desire to address societal issues and perhaps alleviate guilt, some individuals embraced these ideas, despite the inherent challenges they presented. The gurus of this era, for a while, seemed to possess an unstoppable force.

One prominent example is Ibram X. Kendi, a Boston University professor who rose to prominence after the death of George Floyd in 2020. Kendi became a leading voice in discussions about race, authoring books, giving speeches, and advising corporations and politicians. His core concept revolved around the idea of "antiracist discrimination" – implementing discriminatory practices to counteract the effects of past discrimination. This ideology formed the foundation of his work and fueled the diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) movement.

Initially, Kendi was lauded by the media as a brilliant scholar and a moral compass. In 2021, the New York Times published glowing pieces about him, even focusing on his reading habits. He secured a lucrative Netflix deal and substantial funding for his "Center on Antiracist Research" at Boston University.

However, as the fervor surrounding the Black Lives Matter movement subsided, scrutiny of Kendi and his work intensified. Critics questioned his theories and leadership. The Center for Antiracist Research, despite its significant funding, produced minimal research. Kendi's responses to criticism often involved blaming "racist ideas."

While Kendi found a market for his ideas, he wasn't particularly original. Compared to influential figures like W.E.B. DuBois, Malcolm X, James Baldwin, or Angela Davis, his work appears superficial. His children's books and even his works for adults have been criticized for lacking depth.

Perhaps the larger issue lies with the progressive left, which eagerly sought a voice to guide them through complex societal issues. They embraced Kendi, who may not have been equipped to handle the role they thrust upon him. When he became a liability, he was ultimately abandoned by the very institutions that once celebrated him.

The closure of Kendi's center at Boston University and his move to Howard University mark a significant shift. While he may find a welcoming audience at Howard, he's unlikely to regain the same level of influence. Kendi's story serves as a cautionary tale about the fleeting nature of fame and the dangers of placing individuals on pedestals.