Former President Trump's renewed interest in acquiring Greenland has sparked strong reactions internationally, particularly from French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot. Barrot firmly stated that the European Union would not permit any nation, including the United States, to use military force against Greenland, a territory of Denmark. While expressing doubt that the U.S. would resort to such measures, Barrot acknowledged a global shift towards a "survival of the fittest" mentality.

Trump's assertions about Greenland's importance to U.S. national and economic security echo his previous remarks about reclaiming the Panama Canal. During a recent press conference, he declined to rule out military or economic pressure to gain control of either Greenland or the Panama Canal, emphasizing their perceived necessity for economic security. This stance has further fueled international concern and debate.

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen reiterated that Greenland is not for sale, echoing Greenlandic Prime Minister Múte Egede's statements of strong local support for maintaining Greenland's current status. Frederiksen emphasized Greenland's right to self-determination and urged calm amidst the escalating situation, while still recognizing the U.S. as a crucial ally.

Meanwhile, Donald Trump Jr.'s recent visit to Greenland's capital, Nuuk, has added another layer to the unfolding narrative. The younger Trump engaged with locals, explored cultural sites, and filmed podcast content. The former President highlighted the visit on social media, emphasizing the need for safety, security, strength, and peace in Greenland and the "Free World," framing the potential acquisition as a necessary deal and promoting a "MAKE GREENLAND GREAT AGAIN" slogan. He also publicly called on Denmark to relinquish control of Greenland.

This complex situation continues to evolve, with significant implications for international relations and the future of Greenland.