Texas Representative Dan Crenshaw strongly criticized his Democratic counterparts for supporting sex change surgeries for children, labeling such procedures as "cruel" and highlighting the potential for irreversible physiological and mental health consequences. He cited double mastectomies for young girls and castration for young boys, along with the long-term effects of hormone therapy and puberty blockers, as examples of this cruelty.

Crenshaw rejected the notion of a "manufactured culture war" surrounding this issue, pointing out that if it were manufactured, there wouldn't be a debate about banning these procedures. He cited a dramatic increase in transition surgeries and emphasized that Republicans are not fabricating the issue. He also suggested that peer influence plays a significant role in this rise.

The congressman questioned the rationale behind advocating for these procedures given the considerable risks to children's future biological and mental well-being. He drew an analogy to giving a child a banana: while the health benefits of bananas may not be universally recognized, the risks are minimal. In contrast, these medical interventions carry substantial risks and should be approached with extreme caution, especially in the absence of clear benefits.

Crenshaw argued against funding institutions that perform these procedures, asserting that this stance is far from a "pause" on the issue. He also criticized Democrats for disregarding public opinion, which overwhelmingly opposes such procedures, particularly given the involvement of taxpayer funds. He stressed the relevance of this financial aspect, stating, "So you do have to care just a little bit."

He further highlighted the prevalence of co-morbid psychiatric diagnoses in teens seeking gender-affirming care, emphasizing the importance of considering these pre-existing conditions before recommending irreversible physiological changes. He questioned whether proponents of these procedures consider these factors when asserting that denying such care leads to suicide.

Crenshaw concluded by reiterating his position that advocating for caution and further research is not an act of cruelty but rather a responsible approach in the face of a growing trend with insufficient scientific backing. He urged a pause on these procedures, emphasizing the need for more research to understand the long-term effects and potential benefits.

Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) listens to testimony during a House Select Committee on Climate Crisis hearing.

Rep. Dan Crenshaw speaks at a news conference at the U.S. Capitol.