Harris Campaign Blames Media's 'Dumb' Questions for Negative Coverage After Election Loss

Created: JANUARY 25, 2025

Following the Democratic Party's loss in the 2024 presidential election, Kamala Harris' campaign officials, Stephanie Cutter and Jen O'Malley Dillon, have pointed fingers at the media, suggesting that their "dumb" questions contributed to the negative portrayal of the vice president. These remarks were made during a Tuesday appearance on the "Pod Save America" podcast, hosted by David Plouffe, where Cutter, Dillon, and fellow campaign official Quentin Fulks discussed the election's aftermath.

Cutter expressed frustration with the media's "narrative" surrounding Harris, arguing that the focus on insignificant issues diverted attention from the campaign's core message. She questioned whether the media's approach ultimately hindered their efforts, given the limited time candidates have to connect with voters. Dillon echoed this sentiment, emphasizing that the media's focus wasn't aligned with the concerns of everyday voters.

Jen O'Malley Dillon, campaign manager for Kamala Harris, expressed concerns about the media's line of questioning during the election.

Dillon clarified her position, stating that she isn't inherently critical of the media and acknowledging that dwelling on perceived double standards is unproductive. However, she expressed concern over the narrative surrounding Harris' supposed lack of interviews. Dillon explained that while Harris was engaging in interviews, the campaign was simultaneously managing other crucial tasks, including selecting a running mate. She contrasted this with the media's treatment of Trump, suggesting that he faced less scrutiny regarding interview availability.

Later in the podcast, Dillon reiterated her point, dismissing the notion that Harris shied away from interviews as "completely bulls---." She criticized the media for posing superficial and process-oriented questions, which Cutter bluntly labeled as "dumb." Dillon argued that such questions failed to provide voters with substantive information and understanding, ultimately doing a disservice to the electorate.

Kamala Harris during a Fox News interview

These comments sparked widespread criticism on social media, with many dismissing them as mere excuses for the campaign's failure. Critics, including David Sirota, founder of The Lever News, and Ben Yelin, co-host of the Caveat Podcast, expressed disappointment and even outrage at the campaign's post-election analysis. Others, like National Review contributor Pradheep J. Shankar, simply labeled the explanations as "lame excuses." National Review editor Philip Klein pointed out the irony of the campaign's complaint about the perception of Harris avoiding interviews, given her limited solo appearances during the campaign.

Comments(0)

Top Comments

Comment Form