The meticulously constructed legal battles against Donald Trump have crumbled one after another, dashing the hopes of his Democratic detractors and their media allies. Their anticipated victory has transformed into a looming confrontation, a time of reckoning.

Not long ago, Trump's opponents confidently predicted his downfall, envisioning him in an orange jumpsuit behind bars. They believed four criminal indictments would effectively end his aspirations of returning to the White House. However, this carefully crafted plan backfired spectacularly.

As the 2024 presidential election approached, the cases against Trump proved fragile, shattering under legal scrutiny and the weight of public opinion. The prosecutions imploded as evidence of misconduct surfaced, revealing rigged investigations, biased grand juries, misleading warrants, a questionable FBI raid, dubious legal theories, and a prejudiced judge and jury in New York.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's case was the sole indictment to reach trial. His convoluted arguments attempted to transform expired bookkeeping errors into serious felonies, leaving the public and jurors to decipher the actual crimes Trump was convicted of. Judge Juan Merchan's courtroom became a spectacle of biased rulings, turning justice into a mockery. Bragg spent millions to achieve a predetermined outcome that ultimately carried no real penalty under New York law. The case concluded with Trump receiving an unconditional discharge.

In Georgia, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis faced accusations of misconduct, jeopardizing her case against Trump. Special Counsel Jack Smith's pursuit of Trump faltered when a federal judge deemed his appointment unlawful, dismissing charges related to classified documents. Smith's other case in Washington D.C., alleging election interference, was weakened by Supreme Court rulings, and ultimately dismissed after Trump's election victory.

The two-year lawfare campaign against Trump stands as a stark example of legal abuse in modern history. Driven by partisan motives, Democrats assumed indictments would derail Trump's political aspirations. However, as Trump defended himself, the public recognized the prosecutions as manipulative attempts to influence the presidential election. This fueled public resentment and bolstered support for Trump, with votes serving as the ultimate verdict.

The question now is whether those who weaponized the legal system should be held accountable. A thorough investigation by the incoming Department of Justice is crucial. Ignoring unchecked power undermines democracy and erodes respect for the law. There's evidence suggesting Smith, Bragg, and Willis may have manipulated laws for political gain. The timing of Smith's appointment, Colangelo's resignation to lead the New York prosecution, and meetings between Biden's White House and individuals involved in the cases raise serious questions.

While civil rights statutes exist to address prosecutorial misconduct, proving intent to manipulate the law for political damage is a high legal hurdle. Unless overwhelming evidence of criminal behavior emerges, the era of lawfare must end. The American public is weary of politically motivated prosecutions. It's time to put an end to these witch hunts once and for all.